Full Disclosure.

The asymmetry, named

When Google disables an account, no human signs the decision. No reviewer's name appears. No phone number, no postal address, no person you can write back to. The user, meanwhile, is required to upload government ID, prove residency, and recite their life story to a chatbot. One side is fully identified. The other side is fully hidden. Full Disclosure inverts that. We name ourselves on purpose, and we ask — loudly, in writing, in court if needed — for the same from them.

The four commitments

1. Real name, real face, real jurisdiction. You join the register under the name on your government ID, with a photo, and the country you live in. No pseudonyms. No avatars. (If naming yourself is unsafe — domestic violence, asylum, minors — use The Wall as an anonymous witness route instead. Full Disclosure is voluntary, not required.)
2. A signed letter, on the record. You publish a short letter — 200 to 800 words — describing what was taken, by whom, and what you're asking for. It is signed with your name and dated. We host it permanently.
3. A witnessed receipt. You do one Wall call so a named verifier confirms the face matches the name and the story matches the documents. The receipt is published alongside your letter. From that moment on, your entry is independently verifiable — anyone, including a journalist or a regulator, can confirm it without trusting us.
4. Demand the same in return. Every letter ends with one paragraph asking the platform for the named human who made the decision, their reasoning in writing, and a postal address where a reply can be sent. If they refuse, that refusal is part of the record.

What it is NOT

• ✗ Not doxxing. We never publish anyone's home address, phone, or family members — yours or theirs. The named human we're asking for is the professional reviewer at the platform, identified by name and work address, not their private life.
• ✗ Not vigilantism. No coordinated harassment, no pile-ons, no "find this person." Full Disclosure is letter-writing in public, not mob action.
• ✗ Not mandatory. Every other tool on this site works anonymously. This one is for people who choose to stand up by name because they can. Some of us can't, and that's exactly why those of us who can, should.
• ✗ Not a stunt. No flashy reveal, no Guy Fawkes mask coming off on camera. Just a slow, growing, boring, undeniable list.

The founding entry

This site itself is the first entry. It runs under a real name, a real domain, a real postal jurisdiction, with verifiable contact. Everything we ask of the platforms — a named decision-maker, a written reason, a real reply address — we do ourselves first. That's the whole posture: lead with disclosure, then ask for it back.